Psalm 32 Discourse
From Psalms: Layer by Layer
Psalm 32/Discourse
Choose a PsalmNavigate Psalm 32
Psalm 32
Please note: Resources for Psalm 32 are in the process of being reformatted for visual consistency and improved functionality.
About the Discourse Layer
Our Discourse Layer includes four additional layers of analysis:
- Participant analysis
- Macrosyntax
- Speech act analysis
- Emotional analysis
For more information on our method of analysis, click the expandable explanation button at the beginning of each layer.
Participant Analysis
Participant Analysis focuses on the characters in the psalm and asks, “Who are the main participants (or characters) in this psalm, and what are they saying or doing? It is often helpful for understanding literary structure, speaker identification, etc.
For a detailed explanation of our method, see the Participant Analysis Creator Guidelines.
There are 4 participants/characters in Psalm 32:
Profile List
| David (v. 1) |
| YHWH (vv. 2, 5, 10-11) |
| "a shelter" (v. 7) |
| Congregation |
| "righteous ones" (v. 11) |
| "those with integrity in their heart" (v. 11) |
| The faithful person (v. 6) |
| "the one whose offense is taken away, whose sin is forgiven" (v. 1) |
| "the person against whom YHWH does not count guilt" (v. 2) |
| "the one who trusts in YHWH" (v. 10) |
| The wicked (v. 10) |
Profile Notes
- The psalmist is identified as David in the superscription. It is through his own experience of keeping silent about his sin (v. 3a) that led to YHWH's corrective hand (vv. 3b–4), David's confession and subsequent restoration (v. 5) prompt him to share his learned experience with v (vv. 9–11), so that they will not make the same mistake (cf. Ps 51:15).
- YHWH forgives David's sin when David confesses it (v. 5). YHWH is said to be "a shelter" to any and all the faithful who will pray to him (v. 7) when they discover their sin.
- The congregation are considered to be the addressee in vv. 1–2 and 9–11 (see the notes accompanying the text table), to whom David imparts wisdom gained from his own experience. The faithful person is presented as the ideal subset of the congregation, who will duly pray to YHWH when convicted of his sin and experience the same relief David did. Indeed, they are abundantly blessed with forgiven sin (vv. 1–2) and will be able to confess that YHWH surrounds them with celebrations of deliverance (v. 7) in the same way faithfulness surrounds all who trust in YHWH (v. 10).
- On the contrary, the wicked, those who do not recognize and confess their sin, experience nothing but many sorrows (v. 10).
| Hebrew | Verse | English |
|---|---|---|
| לְדָוִ֗ד מַ֫שְׂכִּ֥יל | 1a | By David. A maskil. |
| אַשְׁרֵ֥י נְֽשׂוּי־פֶּ֗שַׁע | 1b | How happy is the one whose offense is taken away, |
| כְּס֣וּי חֲטָאָֽה׃ | 1c | whose sin is covered! |
| אַ֥שְֽׁרֵי אָדָ֗ם לֹ֤א יַחְשֹׁ֬ב יְהוָ֣ה ל֣וֹ עָוֺ֑ן | 2a | How happy is the person against whom YHWH does not count guilt |
| וְאֵ֖ין בְּרוּח֣וֹ רְמִיָּה׃ | 2b | and in whose mind there is no deceit! |
| כִּֽי־הֶ֭חֱרַשְׁתִּי בָּל֣וּ עֲצָמָ֑י | 3a | When I kept silent, my bones began to waste away |
| בְּ֝שַׁאֲגָתִ֗י כָּל־הַיּֽוֹם׃ | 3b | in my groaning all day. |
| כִּ֤י ׀ יוֹמָ֣ם וָלַיְלָה֮ תִּכְבַּ֥ד עָלַ֗י יָ֫דֶ֥ךָ | 4a | For day and night your hand was weighing down upon me. |
| נֶהְפַּ֥ךְ לְשַׁדִּ֑י בְּחַרְבֹ֖נֵי קַ֣יִץ סֶֽלָה׃ | 4b | My vigor was changed like in the drought of summer. Selah. |
| חַטָּאתִ֨י אוֹדִ֪יעֲךָ֡ וַעֲוֺ֘נִ֤י לֹֽא־כִסִּ֗יתִי | 5a | "I will make known my sin to you." I did not cover my guilt; |
| אָמַ֗רְתִּי אוֹדֶ֤ה עֲלֵ֣י פְ֭שָׁעַי לַיהוָ֑ה | 5b | I decided: "I will confess to YHWH about my offenses," |
| וְאַתָּ֨ה נָ֘שָׂ֤אתָ עֲוֺ֖ן חַטָּאתִ֣י סֶֽלָה׃ | 5c | and you took away the guilt of my sin. Selah. |
| עַל־זֹ֡את יִתְפַּלֵּ֬ל כָּל־חָסִ֨יד ׀ | 6a | Because of this, every faithful person should pray |
| אֵלֶיךָ֮ לְעֵ֪ת מְ֫צֹ֥א | 6b | to you at the time of discovery [of his sin]. |
| רַ֗ק לְ֭שֵׁטֶף מַ֣יִם רַבִּ֑ים | 6c | But in the flood of many waters, |
| אֵ֝לָ֗יו לֹ֣א יַגִּֽיעוּ׃ | 6d | they will not reach him. |
| אַתָּ֤ה ׀ סֵ֥תֶר לִי֮ מִצַּ֪ר תִּ֫צְּרֵ֥נִי | 7a | You are a shelter for me; you will protect me from distress. |
| רָנֵּ֥י פַלֵּ֑ט תְּס֖וֹבְבֵ֣נִי סֶֽלָה׃ | 7b | With celebrations of deliverance you will surround me. Selah. |
| אַשְׂכִּֽילְךָ֨ ׀ וְֽאוֹרְךָ֗ בְּדֶֽרֶךְ־ז֥וּ תֵלֵ֑ךְ | 8a | I will give you understanding and I will teach you about the way in which you should walk. |
| אִֽיעֲצָ֖ה עָלֶ֣יךָ עֵינִֽי׃ | 8b | I will advise [you] with my eye upon you. |
| אַל־תִּֽהְי֤וּ ׀ כְּס֥וּס כְּפֶרֶד֮ אֵ֤ין הָ֫בִ֥ין | 9a | Do not be like a horse, like a mule in whom there is no understanding. |
| בְּמֶֽתֶג־וָרֶ֣סֶן עֶדְי֣וֹ לִבְל֑וֹם | 9b | One must restrict its walking with a bit and reins, |
| בַּ֝֗ל קְרֹ֣ב אֵלֶֽיךָ׃ | 9c | otherwise it will not come near you. |
| רַבִּ֥ים מַכְאוֹבִ֗ים לָרָ֫שָׁ֥ע | 10a | The sorrows of the wicked are many, |
| וְהַבּוֹטֵ֥חַ בַּיהוָ֑ה חֶ֝֗סֶד יְסוֹבְבֶֽנּוּ׃ | 10b | but the one who trusts in YHWH—faithfulness surrounds him. |
| שִׂמְח֬וּ בַֽיהוָ֣ה וְ֭גִילוּ צַדִּיקִ֑ים | 11a | Rejoice in YHWH and be glad, you righteous ones, |
| וְ֝הַרְנִ֗ינוּ כָּל־יִשְׁרֵי־לֵֽב׃ | 11b | and shout for joy, all you with integrity in your heart! |
- As discussed in the grammar note, what we have rendered as a verbless clause ("How happy is...!") is morphosyntactically simply a construct chain in Biblical Hebrew ("The happiness of...!"), such that it doesn't qualify as a predication and has not been highlighted in this table.
- Does the addressee shift from the congregation to YHWH in v. 3 or v. 4?
- It is quite possible that v. 3 continues the general wisdom orientation David offers the congregation. Nevertheless, YHWH is unambiguously the addressee in v. 4 and the discourse marker כִּי—which begins v. 4—grounds the content of v. 3. Both verses should therefore be considered one thought unit with the same addressee across both verses.
- For a full discussion concerning whether David or the faithful person (preferred) is speaking in v. 7, see the exegetical issue The Participants of Psalm 32:7-9.
- For a full discussion concerning whether YHWH (preferred) David is speaking in v. 8, see the exegetical issue The Participants of Psalm 32:7-9.
- For a full discussion concerning whether YHWH or David (preferred) is speaking in v. 8, see the exegetical issue The Participants of Psalm 32:7-9.
- For a full discussion concerning whether David or the faithful person is the addressee in v. 8, see the exegetical issue The Participants of Psalm 32:7-9.
- The suffix on אֵלֶֽיךָ at the end of v. 9 has not been highlighted because it is a second-person impersonal (cf. Ps 49:19; Prov 19:25; 30:10, 28). For further discussion, see the exegetical issues The Participants of Psalm 32:7-9 and The Syntax and Meaning of Psalm 32:9c.
Participant Relations Diagram
The relationships among the participants may be abstracted and summarized as follows:
Participant Analysis Summary Distribution
Macrosyntax
Macrosyntax Diagram
| Macrosyntax legend | |
|---|---|
| Vocatives | Vocatives are indicated by purple text. |
| Discourse marker | Discourse markers (such as כִּי, הִנֵּה, לָכֵן) are indicated by orange text. |
 |
The scope governed by the discourse marker is indicated by a dashed orange bracket connecting the discourse marker to its scope. |
 |
The preceding discourse grounding the discourse marker is indicated by a solid orange bracket encompassing the relevant clauses. |
| Subordinating conjunction | The subordinating conjunction is indicated by teal text. |
 |
Subordination is indicated by a solid teal bracket connecting the subordinating conjunction with the clause to which it is subordinate. |
| Coordinating conjunction | The coordinating conjunction is indicated by blue text. |
 |
Coordination is indicated by a solid blue line connecting the coordinating clauses. |
 |
Coordination without an explicit conjunction is indicated by a dashed blue line connecting the coordinated clauses. |
 |
Marked topic is indicated by a black dashed rounded rectangle around the marked words. |
 |
The scope of the activated topic is indicated by a black dashed bracket encompassing the relevant clauses. |
| Marked focus or thetic sentence | Marked focus (if one constituent) or thetic sentences[1] are indicated by bold text. |
 |
Frame setters[2] are indicated by a solid gray rounded rectangle around the marked words. |
| [blank line] | Discourse discontinuity is indicated by a blank line. |
| [indentation] | Syntactic subordination is indicated by indentation. |
 |
Direct speech is indicated by a solid black rectangle surrounding all relevant clauses. |
| (text to elucidate the meaning of the macrosyntactic structures) | Within the CBC, any text elucidating the meaning of macrosyntax is indicated in gray text inside parentheses. |
If an emendation or revocalization is preferred, that emendation or revocalization will be marked in the Hebrew text of all the visuals.
| Emendations/Revocalizations legend | |
|---|---|
| *Emended text* | Emended text, text in which the consonants differ from the consonants of the Masoretic text, is indicated by blue asterisks on either side of the emendation. |
| *Revocalized text* | Revocalized text, text in which only the vowels differ from the vowels of the Masoretic text, is indicated by purple asterisks on either side of the revocalization. |
(Click diagram to enlarge)
- vv. 1-2 and vv. 3-4 are separated by the conclusion of the relativized content which dominates v. 2 and the subordinating כִּי beginning v. 3.
- For the discourse units of vv. 3-4, 5 and 6-7, see the three instances of Selah and the discourse markers in v. 6.
- v. 4 – Although יוֹמָ֣ם וָלַיְלָה֮ could simply be understood as a temporal frame setter, as part of the grounds for the psalmist groaning "all day" (see the previous line), it more likely provides a scalar focus description of the permanency and persistency of YHWH's corrective action.
- v. 5a-b – The two-fold fronting in these two lines loosely resembles a poetic structure of repetition, though the two fronted constituents, חַטָּאתִ֨י "my sin" and עֲוֺ֘נִ֤י "my guilt," are simply read as the clause topic in each case.
- v. 5e – The fronted וְאַתָּ֨ה provides a topic shift, from the psalmist's actions throughout the verse to YHWH's action in this final line.
- v. 6b – The double fronting of לְ֭שֵׁטֶף מַ֣יִם רַבִּ֑ים אֵ֝לָ֗יו is best interpreted as a temporal frame setter, encoded by the לְ prepositional phrase (see the grammar notes), followed by the narrow focus constituent "to him" (see the same information structural configuration in Ps 61:3).
- v. 7b-c – The fronting of both מִצַּ֪ר and רָנֵּ֥י פַלֵּ֑ט creates a pattern of repetition between the two lines. Further, the placement of מִצַּ֪ר before תִּ֫צְּרֵ֥נִי creates phonological cohesion between the sounds miṣṣar and tiṣṣər, and the placement of רָנֵּ֥י פַלֵּ֑ט following תִּ֫צְּרֵ֥נִי creates phonological cohesion between the sounds rēnî and ronnê. Finally, line-(and discourse unit-)final תְּס֖וֹבְבֵ֣נִי provides correspondence to the verse-final יְסוֹבְבֶֽנּוּ of v. 10.
- מִצַּ֪ר תִּ֫צְּרֵ֥נִי
- רָנֵּ֥י פַלֵּ֑ט תְּס֖וֹבְבֵ֣נִי
- v. 9c – The double fronting of בְּמֶֽתֶג־וָרֶ֣סֶן עֶדְי֣וֹ precedes the infinitive, which, as an impersonal, requires an unspecified agent: "it is to restrict" ➞ "one must restrict" (as discussed in the grammar notes). The first and second constituents are unambiguously read as focus followed by topic.
- v. 10a – As discussed in the grammar notes, רַבִּ֥ים is best understood as the comment of this verbless clause (against the Masoretic accents), such that the comment-topic order brings it into prominence.
- v. 10b – The left-dislocated phrase הַבּוֹטֵ֥חַ בַּיהוָ֑ה, resumed by the suffix on יְסוֹבְבֶֽנּוּ, introduces a topic shift from the רָשָׁע of the previous line. (This structure could also have been employed to ensure a suffix on the verb as a poetic connection to תְּס֖וֹבְבֵ֣נִי of v. 7—see above.)
- The only two vocatives in the psalm are found in v. 11. Their positions are both clause- and line-final, such that they function to delimit lines phonologically and facilitate processing of the syntax (Miller 2010, 360-363). The final vocative, including the construct head יִשְׁרֵי, also provides a phonological inclusio with אַשְׁרֵי in vv. 1-2 (see poetic structure).
- vv. 3-4 – As discussed in the grammar notes, the initial כִּי of v. 3 is a subordinator to the following clause, whereas the כִּי of v. 4 grounds the entirety of v. 3, so has been considered a discourse marker grounding the previous discourse, rather than a subordinator.
- v. 6 – As discussed in the grammar notes, the prepositional phrase עַל־זֹ֡את has been grammaticalized (at least received as such in translation) to a logical connector with what precedes.
- v. 6 – The particle רַ֗ק scopes over the entire second line of this verse, such that it has been considered a discourse marker, rather than a focus particle of an individual constituent. It is "interpreted as limiting and countering something in the context."[3] In other words, it "sets a limit and counters the implications of the content of a directly preceding utterance."[4] In the present case, it limits the (mistaken) implications of the previous clause—viz., that the expected outcome of confession of sin is disaster and counters that disaster will not, in fact, come upon the one who confesses. Although this instance of רַק has been deemed "difficult to interpret,"[5] it is one of only two in the Psalms, the other of which (Ps 91:8) is also unambiguously a sentence-level adversative particle.
- See Discourse Markers for a discussion of the כִּי in v. 3.
Speech Act Analysis
The Speech Act layer presents the text in terms of what it does, following the findings of Speech Act Theory. It builds on the recognition that there is more to communication than the exchange of propositions. Speech act analysis is particularly important when communicating cross-culturally, and lack of understanding can lead to serious misunderstandings, since the ways languages and cultures perform speech acts varies widely.
For a detailed explanation of our method, see the Speech Act Analysis Creator Guidelines.
Summary Visual
Speech Act Analysis Chart
The following chart is scrollable (left/right; up/down).
| Verse | Hebrew | CBC | Sentence type | Illocution (general) | Illocution with context | Macro speech act | Intended perlocution (Think) | Intended perlocution (Feel) | Intended perlocution (Do) |
| Verse number and poetic line | Hebrew text | English translation | Declarative, Imperative, or Interrogative Indirect Speech Act: Mismatch between sentence type and illocution type |
Assertive, Directive, Expressive, Commissive, or Declaratory Indirect Speech Act: Mismatch between sentence type and illocution type |
More specific illocution type with paraphrased context | Illocutionary intent (i.e. communicative purpose) of larger sections of discourse These align with the "Speech Act Summary" headings |
What the speaker intends for the address to think | What the speaker intends for the address to feel | What the speaker intends for the address to do |
If an emendation or revocalization is preferred, that emendation or revocalization will be marked in the Hebrew text of all the visuals.
| Emendations/Revocalizations legend | |
|---|---|
| *Emended text* | Emended text, text in which the consonants differ from the consonants of the Masoretic text, is indicated by blue asterisks on either side of the emendation. |
| *Revocalized text* | Revocalized text, text in which only the vowels differ from the vowels of the Masoretic text, is indicated by purple asterisks on either side of the revocalization. |
Emotional Analysis
This layer explores the emotional dimension of the biblical text and seeks to uncover the clues within the text itself that are part of the communicative intent of its author. The goal of this analysis is to chart the basic emotional tone and/or progression of the psalm.
For a detailed explanation of our method, see the Emotional Analysis Creator Guidelines.
Emotional Analysis Chart
If an emendation or revocalization is preferred, that emendation or revocalization will be marked in the Hebrew text of all the visuals.
| Emendations/Revocalizations legend | |
|---|---|
| *Emended text* | Emended text, text in which the consonants differ from the consonants of the Masoretic text, is indicated by blue asterisks on either side of the emendation. |
| *Revocalized text* | Revocalized text, text in which only the vowels differ from the vowels of the Masoretic text, is indicated by purple asterisks on either side of the revocalization. |
Summary Visual
(Click visual to enlarge).
Affective Circumplex
The affective circumplex locates emotions on two axes: (1) positive vs. negative valence; and (2) active vs. passive activation. Since emotional terminology often carries unintended cultural connotations, the purpose of the circumplex is to ease translation of emotions across different languages and cultures.
Bibliography
- Atkinson, Ian. 2026. "Demonstrative Pronouns," in The Cambridge Grammar of Biblical Hebrew. Edited by Geoffrey Khan et al. Cambridge: Open Book & University of Cambridge.
- Auffret, Pierre. 2011. "'Et toi, tu as enlevé la faute de mon péché': nouvelle étude structurelle du Psaume 32." Journal of the Ancient Near Eastern Society 32 (1): 9 pages.
- Blau, Joshua. 2010. Phonology and Morphology of Biblical Hebrew: an Introduction. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
- Böhler, Dieter. 2021. Psalmen 1-50. Freiburg, Basel, Wien: Herder Verlag.
- Botha, Phil J. 2019. "Psalm 32: A Social-scientific Investigation," in OTE 32.1: 12-31.
- Bratcher, Robert G. and Reyburn, William David. 1991. A Translator’s Handbook on the Book of Psalms, UBS Handbook Series. New York, NY: United Bible Societies.
- Brockelmann, Carl. 1956. Hebräische Syntax. Neukirchen: Verlag der Buchhandlung des Erziehungsvereins.
- Castellino, George. 1952. "Psalm XXXII 9," in VT 2(1): 37–42.
- Hoftijzer, J. & Jongeling, K 1995. Dictionary of the North-West Semitic Inscriptions. Leiden: Brill.
- Jastrow, Marcus. 1903. A Dictionary of the Targumim, the Talmud Babli and Yerushalmi, and the Midrashic Literature. London: W.C. Luzac & Co.
- Jenni, Ernst. 1992. Die Hebräischen Präpositionen Band 1: Die Präposition Beth. Stuttgart: Verlag W. Kohlhammer.
- Jenni, Ernst. 2000. Die Hebräischen Präpositionen Band 3: Die Präposition Lamed. Stuttgart: Verlag W. Kohlhammer.
- Keel, Othmar. 1997. The Symbolism of the Biblical World: Ancient Near Eastern Iconography and the Book of Psalms. Leiden: Brill.
- Levinsohn, S. H. 2011. "רַק and ְאַךְ: Limiting and Countering." Hebrew Studies 52(1): 83–105.
- Khan, Geoffrey. 2026a. "Qaṭal," in Geoffrey Khan et al. (eds.) The Cambridge Grammar of Biblical Hebrew. Cambridge: Open Book Publishers & University of Cambridge.
- Khan, Geoffrey. 2026b. "Yiqṭol," in Geoffrey Khan et al. (eds.) The Cambridge Grammar of Biblical Hebrew. Cambridge: Open Book Publishers & University of Cambridge.
- Kovecses, Zoltan. 2010. Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Miller, Cynthia L. 2010. "Vocative Syntax in Biblical Hebrew Prose and Poetry: A Preliminary Analysis." Semitic Studies 55(1): 347–364.
- Mena, Andrea K. 2012. "The Semantic Potential of עַל in Genesis, Psalms, and Chronicles." MA Thesis, Stellenbosch University.
- del Olmo Lete, Gregorio & Sanmartín, Joaquín. 2015. A Dictionary of the Ugaritic Language in the Alphabetic Tradition, Third Revised Edition. Leiden: Brill.
- Potgieter, J. H. 2014. "The structure and homogeneity of Psalm 32," HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies 70(1), Art. #2725.
- Procházková, Ivana. 2021. The Torah / Law is a Journey: Using Cognitive and Culturally Oriented Linguistics to Interpret and Translate Metaphors in the Hebrew Bible. Prague: Karolinum Press.
- von Soden, Wolfram. 1968. "Aramäische Wörter in neuassyrischen und neu- und spätbabylonischen Texten. Ein Vorbericht. II." Orientalia 37(3): 261-271.
- von Soden, Wolfram. 1977. "Aramäische Wörter in neuassyrischen und neu- und spätbabylonischen Texten. Ein Vorbericht. III." Orientalia 46(2): 183–197.
- Sokoloff, Michael. 2014. A Dictionary of Christian Palestinian Aramaic. Leuven: Peeters.
- Sjörs, Ambjörn. 2026, "The Infinitive Construct," in Geoffrey Khan et al. (eds.) The Cambridge Grammar of Biblical Hebrew. Cambridge: Open Book Publishers & University of Cambridge.
- Qafaḥ, Yosef. 1965. The Psalms with Translation and Commentary of Saadia Gaon (in Hebrew: תהלים עם תרגום פוירוש הגאון). Jerusalem: The American Academy for Jewish Research (האקדימיה האמריקאנית למדעי היהדות).
- van der Lugt, Pieter. 2024. The Beatitude אַשְׁרֵי and the Confession of Sins in Psalms 32-41, in VT 74: 115-136.
- van der Merwe, C. H. J., Naudé, Jacobus and Kroeze, Jan. 1999. Biblical Hebrew Reference Grammar. London: Bloomsbury.
- Wagner, Norman E. 1960. "רִנָּה in the Psalter." VT 10(4): 435–441.
- Weitzman, M. P. 1999. The Syriac Version of the Old Testament: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Yuditsky, Alexey Eliyahu. 2017. A Grammar of the Hebrew of Origen's Transcriptions (Hebrew). Jerusalem: The Academy of the Hebrew Language.
Footnotes
- ↑ When the entire utterance is new/unexpected, it is a thetic sentence (often called "sentence focus"). See our Creator Guidelines for more information on topic and focus.
- ↑ Frame setters are any orientational constituent – typically, but not limited to, spatio-temporal adverbials – function to "limit the applicability of the main predication to a certain restricted domain" and "indicate the general type of information that can be given" in the clause nucleus (Krifka & Musan 2012: 31-32). In previous scholarship, they have been referred to as contextualizing constituents (see, e.g., Buth (1994), “Contextualizing Constituents as Topic, Non-Sequential Background and Dramatic Pause: Hebrew and Aramaic evidence,” in E. Engberg-Pedersen, L. Falster Jakobsen and L. Schack Rasmussen (eds.) Function and expression in Functional Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 215-231; Buth (2023), “Functional Grammar and the Pragmatics of Information Structure for Biblical Languages,” in W. A. Ross & E. Robar (eds.) Linguistic Theory and the Biblical Text. Cambridge: Open Book Publishers, 67-116), but this has been conflated with the function of topic. In brief: sentence topics, belonging to the clause nucleus, are the entity or event about which the clause provides a new predication; frame setters do not belong in the clause nucleus and rather provide a contextual orientation by which to understand the following clause.
- ↑ Levinsohn 2011, 102.
- ↑ BHRG §40.41.1.b, emphasis added.
- ↑ van der Merwe et al. 1999, §41.4.7.2.