Psalm 133 Discourse

From Psalms: Layer by Layer
Psalm 133/Discourse
Jump to: navigation, search
  Choose a Psalm  Navigate Psalm 133

About the Discourse Layer

Our Discourse Layer includes four additional layers of analysis:

  • Participant analysis
  • Macrosyntax
  • Speech act analysis
  • Emotional analysis


For more information on our method of analysis, click the expandable explanation button at the beginning of each layer.

Participant Analysis

  What is Participant Analysis?

This resource is forthcoming.


This resource is forthcoming.

Participant Relations Diagram

The relationships among the participants may be abstracted and summarized as follows:

Psalm 133 - Participant Analysis Summary.jpg

The Participant Analysis Mini-Story is forthcoming.

Participant Analysis Summary Distribution

This resource is forthcoming.



Macrosyntax

  What is Macrosyntax?

Macrosyntax Diagram

  Legend

(Click diagram to enlarge)


Psalm 133 - Macrosyntax.jpg

This resource is in the process of reformatting. To view the notes on the Macrosyntax of Psalm 133, click here.



Speech Act Analysis

  What is Speech Act Analysis?

Summary Visual

This resource is forthcoming.




Speech Act Chart

The following chart is scrollable (left/right; up/down).

  Legend

This resource is forthcoming.

Emotional Analysis

  What is Emotional Analysis?

Emotional Analysis Chart

  Legend

[[File: |class=img-fluid|1110px]]


Summary Visual

(Click visual to enlarge).


Psalm 133 - Emotional Analysis Summary.jpg



Bibliography



Footnotes

  1. When the entire utterance is new/unexpected, it is a thetic sentence (often called "sentence focus"). See our Creator Guidelines for more information on topic and focus.
  2. Frame setters are any orientational constituent – typically, but not limited to, spatio-temporal adverbials – function to "limit the applicability of the main predication to a certain restricted domain" and "indicate the general type of information that can be given" in the clause nucleus (Krifka & Musan 2012: 31-32). In previous scholarship, they have been referred to as contextualizing constituents (see, e.g., Buth (1994), “Contextualizing Constituents as Topic, Non-Sequential Background and Dramatic Pause: Hebrew and Aramaic evidence,” in E. Engberg-Pedersen, L. Falster Jakobsen and L. Schack Rasmussen (eds.) Function and expression in Functional Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 215-231; Buth (2023), “Functional Grammar and the Pragmatics of Information Structure for Biblical Languages,” in W. A. Ross & E. Robar (eds.) Linguistic Theory and the Biblical Text. Cambridge: Open Book Publishers, 67-116), but this has been conflated with the function of topic. In brief: sentence topics, belonging to the clause nucleus, are the entity or event about which the clause provides a new predication; frame setters do not belong in the clause nucleus and rather provide a contextual orientation by which to understand the following clause.