Legends

From Psalms: Layer by Layer
Jump to: navigation, search

Emendations/Revocalizations

Diagram (Grammar/Lexical)

The grammar layer visually represents the grammar and syntax of each clause. It also displays alternative interpretations of the grammar. (For more information, click "Grammar Legend" below.)

Venn diagrams (Lexical)

(For more information, click "Venn Diagram Legend" below.)

Repeated roots (Lexical)

The repeated roots legend will be provided on a psalm-by-psalm basis by the Guardian, so this cannot be a template. The example below is from Psalm 19.

The repeated roots table is intended to identify the roots which are repeated in the psalm.

(For more information, click "Repeated Roots Legend" below.)

Diagram (Phrase-level)

(For more information, click "Phrase-level Legend" below.)

Verbal Semantics Chart (Verbal)

(For more information, click "Verbal Legend" below.)

Expanded paraphrase (Story Behind)

(For more information, click "Expanded Paraphrase Legend" below.)

Story triangles (Story Behind)

(For more information, click "Story Triangle Legend" below.)

Macrosyntax visual (Macrosyntax)

(For more information, click "Macrosyntax Legend" below.)

Speech Act Summary (Speech Act/Emotional Analysis)

(For more information, click "Speech Act Summary Legend" below.)

Speech Act Table (Speech Act/Emotional Analysis)

(For more information, click "Speech Act Table Legend" below.)

Line division (Poetic structure)

(For more information, click "Poetic Structure Legend" below.)

References

  1. Common-ground assumptions include information shared by the speaker and hearers. In our analysis, we mainly use this category for Biblical/ANE background - beliefs and practices that were widespread at this time and place. This is the background information necessary for understanding propositions that do not readily make sense to those who are so far removed from the culture in which the proposition was originally expressed.
  2. Local-ground assumptions are those propositions which are necessarily true if the text is true. They include both presuppositions and entailments. Presuppositions are those implicit propositions which are assumed to be true by an explicit proposition. Entailments are those propositions which are necessarily true if a proposition is true.
  3. Whereas local-ground assumptions are inferences which are necessarily true if the text is true, play-ground assumptions are those inferences which might be true if the text is true.
  4. When the entire utterance is new/unexpected, it is a thetic sentence (often called "sentence focus"). See our Creator Guidelines for more information on topic and focus.
  5. Frame setters are any orientational constituent – typically, but not limited to, spatio-temporal adverbials – function to "limit the applicability of the main predication to a certain restricted domain" and "indicate the general type of information that can be given" in the clause nucleus (Krifka & Musan 2012: 31-32). In previous scholarship, they have been referred to as contextualizing constituents (see, e.g., Buth (1994), “Contextualizing Constituents as Topic, Non-Sequential Background and Dramatic Pause: Hebrew and Aramaic evidence,” in E. Engberg-Pedersen, L. Falster Jakobsen and L. Schack Rasmussen (eds.) Function and expression in Functional Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 215-231; Buth (2023), “Functional Grammar and the Pragmatics of Information Structure for Biblical Languages,” in W. A. Ross & E. Robar (eds.) Linguistic Theory and the Biblical Text. Cambridge: Open Book Publishers, 67-116), but this has been conflated with the function of topic. In brief: sentence topics, belonging to the clause nucleus, are the entity or event about which the clause provides a new predication; frame setters do not belong in the clause nucleus and rather provide a contextual orientation by which to understand the following clause.