The river has been interpreted in a number of ways.
A real river or water course. Some scholars understand the river in Psalm 46 as the Jordan river in the vicinity of Dan, or Hezekiah’s tunnel which directed the waters of the Gihon spring into Jerusalem.
The river with four streams from Genesis 2. Others link it to the river in Genesis 2 or view it as generally reflecting ancient Near Eastern (ANE) descriptions of paradisiacal conditions.
Water associated with the Temple in Jerusalem. Some scholars connect the river with the bronze sea in the Solomonic Temple.
God’s royal provision of water to his city. Finally, the river and its streams can be read as God's supply of water to the city akin to the irrigation projects of ANE monarchs.
So, what sort of river does the psalm envisage and why does it matter?
Argument Maps[]
Option 1: A Specific River or Water Course[]
A number of scholars have tried to locate the river in Psalm 46 within the topography of Syro-Palestine. According to M. Goulder, for example, this river is the river Jordan and the unnamed city of God is Dan. Thus, for him, the waters from vv. 2-4 "become a fruitful river, whose sources, outside (and within) Dan and away at Baneas, form a confluence beneath the city. They provide the moisture which crowns the area with lofty trees, and which waters the meadows nearby, so making glad the environs the whole year round."[2] Others connect it to Hezekiah’s tunnel which channelled the waters of the Gihon spring into Jerusalem (2 Kgs 20:20; 2 Chr 32:2–4, 30; Sir 48:17-18; cf. Isa 22:9-11),[3] and some compare its significance to the value of the river Euphrates to Babylon.[4]
Option 2: The River from Genesis 2[]
Many scholars understand the river in Ps 46:5 as an allusion to the river in Gen 2:10 or, generally, as a reflection of ANE descriptions of paradisiacal conditions.[5] "What is intended is the river of grace, which is also likened to a river of paradise in Psa 36:9. When the city of God is threatened and encompassed by foes, still she shall not hunger and thirst, nor fear and despair; for the river of grace and of her ordinances and promises flows with its rippling waves through the holy place, where the dwelling-place or tabernacle of the Most High is pitched."[6]
Option 3: The Bronze Sea in the Temple[]
Furthermore, since in the psalms the word נהר can represent "sea",[7] in Psalm 46 this word can stand for the "bronze sea," a round basin located between the altar and the porch in the court of the Solomonic Temple (1 Kgs 7:23-26; 2 Chr 4:2-5, 10).[8] Thus, comparing the water imagery in Psalm 46 with Isa 8:6-7, O. Keel notes that both traditions juxtapose raging waters with those that flow gently, and the latter are specifically linked to the waters of Shiloah, "the conduit (or one of the conduits?) of Gihon" in Isa 8:6-7. He further observes that although Ps 46:5 does not explicitly refer to the Temple, "it is possible that in this instance 'city of God' denotes only the temple area (cf. 2 Kgs 10:25 RSVm) and not Jerusalem as a whole ..."[9]
Option 4: God's Royal Irrigation of the City (preferred)[]
Finally, the river with its streams could be understood as representing God’s royal provision of water to his city akin to the activities of ANE monarchs.[10] Given the Psalm's dual focus—the elimination of external threat to the city cast as mighty waters and securing its well-being through life-giving streams—the psalm echoes ANE royal inscriptions with a similar dual focus. Sennacherib’s Bavian Inscription (RINAP 223) is a case in point. In it, the Assyrian ruler documents his civil projects in Assyria and also his conquest of Babylon in 689 BCE. "In both cases, Sennacherib emphasizes his ingenious technical ability to manipulate water for the benefit of the Assyrian state, either through the creative irrigation of the Assyrian heartland and the new capital, or the destructive flooding and leveling of Babylon.... the dichotomy presented by these activities, a dualism of 'nurture and control' through technical expertise, is a persistent theme throughout the rhetoric of Sennacherib’s inscriptions and reliefs."[11]
Conclusion[]
Due to the multi-valence of water symbolism in HB and ANE, the views on the significance of the river and its streams in Ps 46:5 are many and not always clear-cut. Although scholars may lean towards a particular reading more strongly, they do not rule out other interpretive possibilities or argue for a combination of two or more readings. Given the arguments presented above, Option 4 (in conjunction with elements from Options 1 and 2) is preferable. This is due to the Psalm's overall focus which shows affinity with ANE royal propagandistic literature (i.e., West and East Semitic royal inscriptions) with a dual agenda of "control and nurture".[12]
Notably, this agenda is often couched in cosmological terms, whereby the subjugation of external forces (foreign kings) is ideologized as conquering the primeval chaos and disorder and the undertaking of domestic projects (e.g., irrigation work) is cast in terms of (re)establishing order and (re)creating paradisiacal conditions.[13] Significantly, such ideology of royal achievements closely aligned the modus operandi of earthly monarchs with that of divine kings. Of special interest for the discussion at hand is that engineered by kings, ancient canal systems not only provided water supply to cities and their surroundings, but also served as part of the cities' defensive structures. As such, they were a source of particular pride to ANE monarchs as seen, for example, from Ashurnasirpal II's account of digging "A Canal of Abundance"[14] or Sennacherib's Bavian Inscription regarding his irrigation feats.[15]
Although Israel's kings had similar concerns and were involved in similar projects (e.g., Hezekiah and the tunnel he built in Jerusalem) Israel's theology demanded they and their subjects look to YHWH for sustenance and protection (cf. Isa 22:8-11). Reflecting this, Psalm 46 speaks of the inviolability of God's city and showcases its own version of the "nurture and control" programme. In it, the city's divine king, YHWH of Hosts, addresses external threat, i.e., nations and kingdoms metaphorized as chaotic waters (vv. 2-4, 7-11),[16] and turns his city, the cultic center par excellence, into a well-watered and well-protected, Eden-like, space (v. 5).
There is a river whose streams make glad the city of God,
the holy place where the Most High dwells.
God is within her, she will not fall;
God will help her at break of day (Ps 46:5-6 [4-5; NIV]).
Research[]
Secondary Literature[]
Bagg, Ariel. 2000. “Irrigation in Northern Mesopotamia: Irrigation for the Assyrian Capitals (12th-7th centuries BC).” Irrigation and Drainage Systems 14: 301-324.
Bauer, Johannes B. 1977. "Zions Flüsse: Ps. 45 (46), 5." Pages 59-91 in Johannes B. Bauer & Johannes Marbock (eds.), Memoria Jerusalem. Freundesgabe Franz Sauer zum 70. Geburtstag. Graz: Akademische Druck-u. Verlagsanstalt.
Briggs, Charles Augustus and Emilie Grace Briggs. 1906. A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Book of Psalms. vol. 2. ICC. Edinburgh: T&T Clark.
Brown, William P. 2002. Seeing the Psalms: A Theology of Metaphor. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press.
Craigie, Peter C., and Marvin E. Tate. 1983. 2nd ed. Psalms 1–50. vol. 19. WBC. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan.
Crouch, Carly L. 2009. War and Ethics in the Ancient Near East: Military Violence in Light of Cosmology and History. Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für die Alttestamentliche Wissenschaft 407. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Crouch, Carly L. 2015. "On Floods and the Fall of Nineveh: a Note on the Origins of a Spurious Tradition." Pages 212-216 in New Perspectives on Old Testament Prophecy and History. Leiden: Brill.
Day, John. 1985. God’s Conflict with the Dragon and the Sea: Echoes of a Canaanite Myth in the Old Testament. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dalley, Stephanie. 2001–2002. “Water Management in Assyria from the Ninth to the Seventh Centuries BC,” Aram 13–14: 443–460.
DeClaissé-Walford, Nancy, Rolf A. Jacobson, and Beth LaNeel Tanner. 2014. The Book of Psalms. NICOT. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.
Delitzsch, Franz. 1883. Biblical Commentary on the Psalms. vol. 1. Translated by Eaton David. New York, NY: Funk and Wagnalls.
Ego, Beate. 2001. “Die Wasser der Gottesstadt: Zu einem Motiv der Zionstradition und seinen kosmologischen Implikationen.” Pages 361–389 in Das biblische Weltbild und seine altorientalischen Kontexte. ed. Bernd Janowski and Beate Ego. FAT 32; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
Fuchs, Andreas. 1994. Inschriften Sargons II aus Khorsabad. Göttingen: Cuvillier.
Goulder, Michael D. 1982. The Psalms of the Sons of Korah. Sheffield: JSOT Press.
Gersbach, James E. 2022. The War Cry in the Graeco-Roman World. RMCS; London: Routledge.
Grayson. Kirk A. and Jamie Novotny. 2014. The Royal Inscriptions of Sennacherib, King of Assyria (704–681 BC). University Park, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, Eisenbrauns.
Green, Douglas J. 2010. “I Undertook Great Works”: The Ideology of Domestic Achievements in West Semitic Royal Inscriptions. Forschungen zum Alten Testament 2 Reihe 41. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
Gunkel, Hermann. 1895. Schopfung und Chaos in Urzeit und Endzeit. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht.
Hayes, John. 1963. “The Tradition of Zion’s Inviolability.” Journal of Biblical Literature. 419-426.
Hengstenberg, Ernst Wilhelm. 1863. Commentary on the Psalms. vol. 2. Edinburgh: T&T Clark.
Horowitz, Victor and Joan G. Westenholz. 1990. "LKA 63: A Heroic Poem in Celebration of Tiglath Pileser Is Musru-Qumanu Campaign." Journal of Cuneiform Studies 42: 1-49.
Jacobson, Rolf. A. 2020. "Psalm 46: Translation, Structure, and Theology." Word and World 40: 308-320.
Junker, H. 1962. "Der Strom, dessen Arme die Stadt Gottes erfreuen (Ps. 46,5)." Biblica 43: 197-201.
Keel, Othmar. 1997. The Symbolism of the Biblical World: Ancient Near Eastern Iconography and the Book of Psalms. Tran. by T.J. Hallett. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.
Kissane, Edward. 1953. The Book of Psalms. vol. 1, Westminster, MD: The Newman Press.
Langendorfer, Breton Adam. 2012. "Who Builds Assyria: Nurture and Control in Sennacherib's Great Relief at Khinnis." MA Thesis, The University of Texas at Austin.
Maier, Christl. 2008. Daughter Zion, Mother Zion: Gender, Space, and the Sacred in Ancient Israel. Minneapolis, MI: Fortress Press.
Miller, Robert D. 2010. “The Zion Hymns as Instruments of Power.” Ancient Near Eastern Studies 47: 217–39.
Miller, Robert D. 2013. “What Are the Nations Doing in the Chaoskampf?” Pages 206-215 in Creation and Chaos: A Reconsideration of Hermann Gunkel's Chaoskampf Hypothesis. ed. JoAnn Scurlock, and Richard H. Beal. Penn State University Press.
Miller, Robert D. 2018. The Dragon, the Mountain, and the Nations: An Old Testament Myth, Its Origins, and Its Afterlives. Explorations in Ancient Near Eastern Civilizations. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.
Neve, Lloyd. 1974/75. "The Common Use of Traditions by the Author of Psalm 46 and Isaiah." The Expository Times 86: 243-246.
O’Kelly, Matthew A. 2024. "Stillness and Salvation: Reading Psalm 46 in Its Context." Journal for the Study of the Old Testament 48: 371–383.
Russell, John Malcolm. 1991. Sennacherib’s Palace Without Rival at Nineveh. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Russell, S.C. 2017. The King and the Land: A Geography of Royal Power in the Biblical World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Smith, George Adam. 1920. The Historical Geography of the Holy Land: Especially in Relation to the History of Israel and of the Early Church. New York, NY: George H. Doran.
Srokosz, Meric and Rebecca S. Watson. 2017. Blue Planet, Blue God: The Bible and the Sea. London: SCM Press, 2017.
Stager, L.E. 1999. "Jerusalem and the Garden of Eden," in Frank Moore Cross Volume. (eds) B.A Levine, P.J. King, J. Naveh, E. Stem. Jerusalem: Israel Exploration Society.
Stuhlmueller, C. 1990. “Psalm 46 and the Prophecy of Isaiah Evolving into a Prophetic, Messianic Role.” Pages 18-27 in Jack C. Knight and Lawrence A. Sinclair, eds. The Psalms and Other Studies on the Old Testament. Nashotah, WI: Nashotah House Seminary.
Tsumura, David T. 2022. "Chaos and Chaoskampf in the Bible: Is 'Chaos' a Suitable Term to Describe Creation or Conflict in the Bible?" Pages 243–281 in Conversations on Canaanite and Biblical Themes: Creation, Chaos and Monotheism. ed. Rebecca S. Watson and Adrian H. Curtis. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Tsumura, David Toshio. 1980. “The Literary Structure of Psalm 46, 2-8.” Annual of the Japanese Biblical Institute 6: 29-55.
Tsumura, David Toshio. 2014. Creation and Destruction: A Reappraisal of the Chaoskampf Theory in the Old Testament. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.
Ur, Jason. 2005. “Sennacheribʼs Northern Assyrian Canals: New Insights from Satellite Imagery and Aerial Photography.” Iraq 67: 317–345.
Watson, Rebecca S. 2005. Chaos Uncreated: A Reassessment of the Theme of “Chaos” in the Hebrew Bible. Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für die alttestamentliche Wissenschaft 341. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Watson, Rebecca S. 2018. “'Therefore We Will Not Fear”? The Psalms of Zion in Psychological Perspective." Pages 182-216 in James K. Aitken and Hilary F. Marlow (eds.), The City in the Hebrew Bible: Critical, Literary and Exegetical Approaches. LHBOTS 672. London: T&T Clark.
Weiser, Artur. 1962. The Psalms. OTL. Trans. by Herbert Hartwell. Philadelphia, PA: Westminster Press.
Wilkinson, Tony J. 2003. Archaeological Landscapes of the Near East. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
Wright, Jacob. 2015. “Urbicide: The Ritualized Killing of Cities in the Ancient Near East.” Pages 147-166 in Saul M. Olyan (ed.), Ritual Violence in the Hebrew Bible: New Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
↑ Goulder 1982, 142 (cf. Smith 1920, 472-473). For him the "Chief Musician" is a Danite priest-poet, who performs a confident confession in God. Cf. Goldingay (2007, 68–69), who also notes that Dan, in the North, has a river, but Jerusalem does not. Goulder also connects על עלמות in the superscription to the river Jordan, saying, "We do best to take על in the locative sense as before; just as 45 was sung 'by the Lilies' in the city gateway, so was 46 sung 'at the Deeps,' the mysterious depths from which the waters of Jordan flooded forth, 'a stream about twelve feet broad by three deep... from the bowels of the earth.'" (Goulder 1982, 139).
↑E.g., Briggs and Briggs 1906, 395; Kirkpatrick 1951, 256; etc. Neve, for example, points out that in Psalm 46 and in Isaiah 8 the flow seems to be into the city of Jerusalem. "In Psalm 46, he notes, the waters make glad the city of Jerusalem. In Is 8:6 the fact that the people of Jerusalem refuse the waters of Shiloah presupposes their flow into the city of Jerusalem. That the poet has reversed the flow of the river to run up and into Jerusalem seems to me to be the strongest evidence possible for the dating of this psalm to a time when just such an engineering feat must have been a lively topic of conversation in Jerusalem. Isaiah is the only prophet, in 22:9-11, to mention Hezekiah’s efforts to bring the waters of the Spring of Gihon into the city of Jerusalem" (Neve 1974/75, 244). This is described in the Siloam Tunnel Inscription (https://blog.bibleodyssey.com/articles/the-siloam-inscription-and-hezekiahs-tunnel/):
(1) [. . .] the tunneling. And this is the narrative of the tunneling: While [the stone-cutters were wielding]
(2) the picks, each toward his co-worker,the picks, each toward his coworker, and while there were still three cubits to tunnel through, the voice of a man was heard calling out
(3) to his co-worker, because there was a fissure in the rock, running from south [to north]. And on the (final) day of
(4) tunneling, each of the stonecutters was striking (the stone) forcefully so as to meet his co-worker, pick after pick. And
(5) then the water began to flow from the source to the pool, a distance of 1200 cubits. And 100
(6) cubits was the height of the rock above the head of the stone-cutters.
On Hezekiah’s efforts to build the tunnel (2 Kgs 20:20 and 2 Chr 32:2–4) and the royal shaping of the water supply system, see further Russell 2017, 84–106.
↑ E.g., Junker 1962, 200 (although he compares the river to the Euphrates metaphorically, i.e, what the river Euphrates meant for its region and, more specifically, for Babylon, that is what the nameless river in Psalm 46 is supposed to signify for the city of God); Maier 2008, 47; see also Bauer 1977, 59-91, etc.
↑Weiser 1962, 370; Delitzsch , 94; Hengstenberg , 149; Anderson 1972, 357; Kraus 1978, 499; Wilson 2002, 717, n. 9; Goldingay 2007, 69; Ego 2001, 361–89, 363–69; Wallace 2009, 95–96; Blenkinsopp 2011, 61; Ross 2013, 92–93; O’Kelly 2024, 371–383. These readings, however, are not identical.
↑Delitzsch 94. For streams of paradise, see Bauer 1977, 65–66; Lipinski 1965, 445; Schreiner 1963, 222; Miller 2010, 219. On Jerusalem and garden of Eden, see Stager 1999, 185. Cf. "Though the location of the garden in Gen. 2 has been a point of scholarly puzzlement, Michael LeFebvre (2018: 35–42) argues compellingly for Eden being atop Mt Zion and the garden as a sort of paradisiacal Jerusalem. Against this, it might be objected that this interpretation is open to problems of topography. LeFebvre (2018: 38–39), in fact, identifies the river in Gen. 2.10 with the Jordan, which would not appear to help his case. In response, he points out that, as noted above, the prophets had no qualms with symbolically changing the lay of the land to make their point (cf. Mic. 4.1–2; Isa. 40.3–5; Zech. 14.8, 10). The author of Genesis is merely doing the same, and the psalmist, with Gen. 2.10 in mind, is following suit" (O’Kelly 2024, 379). On gentle, nourishing waters in ANE and HB, see Keel 1997, 136–44; Brown 2002, 122–36; also, Jacobson 2020, 317. Cf. "The water imagery used in Psalm 46 may be compared with that used in Psalm 42. In Psalm 42, the singer begins with calm images of water—running brooks and tears—and moves to chaotic images—waterfalls and breakers and waves. In Psalm 46, the imagery moves in the opposite direction, from chaos—mountains quaking in the heart of the seas and waters foaming—to calm—a river with streams. In each instance, the presence of God signals calm and order, while God’s absence or distance from the psalmist elicits images of chaos" (deClaissé-Walford et al. 2014 n.p.).
↑Ibid., 140. Cf. R. Jacobson's assertion that "The river here symbolizes the Temple on Mount Zion as the new Garden of Eden, about which Genesis says, 'A river flows out of Eden to water the garden” (2:10). The river gives life. The symbolism of the garden was carved into the walls of Jerusalem’s temple throughout, where there were also carved 'palm trees, and open flowers' (1 Kgs 6:29, 32, 35)" (Jacobson 2020, 317; Srokosz and Watson 2017, 110).
↑ Notably, without citing ANE inscriptions, H. Junker helpfully observed that the psalmist borrowed his idea from a city for which the presence of a river was topographically appropriate and applied it metaphorically to Jerusalem. So, what the river with its canals means for city X, e.g., security and sustenance, the presence of God in his sanctuary means for Jerusalem. Accordingly, “the river” poetically recycled in Psalm 46 could be the Euphrates and the city X could be Babylon, which was crossed by three main and fourteen secondary canals of its “river”. These in turn provided water to irrigate the city with its gardens and fields and were also part of the city's defensive structures (Junker 1962, 200). Relatedly, having access to food and water in war (particularly when under siege) was crucial. In some accounts of protracted siege operations in antiquity, the attacking side would “taunt” its besieged and starving opponents by parading foodstuffs outside their city walls. The defending population, however, could also “taunt” the attacker by throwing its food over the walls. In so doing, the besieged would indicate that they had enough resources to withstand the siege (Gersbach 2022, 68).
↑On the Zion hymns, of which Psalm 46 is one, as instruments of power, see Miller (2010, 217–239).
↑ In a number of publications, C.L. Crouch, for example, has argued that violence against one’s enemy corresponded to the primeval struggle of the gods against chaos. In War and Ethics in the Ancient Near East, she asserts that, “underlying similarities of cosmological and ideological outlook in the societies of Assyria, Judah and Israel have generated significant similarities in their ethical outlooks. In all three societies the mythological traditions surrounding creation reflect a strong connection between war, kingship and the establishment of order.” This in turn demanded that human kings align their modus operandi in war with that of divine kings at creation (Crouch 2009, 194).
↑"The canal cascades from above into the gardens. Fragrance pervades the walkways. Streams of water (as numerous) as the stars of heaven flow in the pleasure garden. Pomegranates which are bedecked with clusters like grape vines […] in the garden [… I,] Ashurnasirpal, in the delightful garden pick fruit like […]" (RIM A.0.101.30 48–52, trans. Grayson).
↑"I d(u)g [that] canal with (only) seventy men and I named it Nār-Sennacherib. I added (its water) to the water from the wells and the canals that I had previously d[ug], and (then) I directed their courses to Nineveh, the exalted cult center, my royal residence, whose site [the king]s, my [ancestor]s, since time imme[morial] had not made large (enough), nor had they expertly carried out its artful execution" (RINAP 223, 15b–18a; Grayson and Novotny 2014, 316-317). Notably, in this inscription, the king first chronicles his irrigation programme, channeling water to Nineveh, his capital, and other regions in the land. Then, he speaks of battling many kings, relating particularly the destruction of Babylon through flooding. "I destroyed, devastated, (and) burned with fire the city, and (its) buildings, from its foundations to its crenellations. I removed the brick(s) and earth, as much as there was, from the (inner) wall and outer wall, the temples, (and) the ziggurrat, (and) I threw into the Araḫtu river. I dug canals into the center of that city and (thus) leveled their site with water. I destroyed the outline of its foundations and (thereby) made its destruction surpass that of the Deluge. So that in the future, the site of that city and (its) temples will be unrecognizable, I dissolved it (Babylon) in water and annihilated (it), (making it) like a meadow" (Grayson and Novotny 2014, 316-317). Due to this section, this inscription "has been described as 'a negative building inscription,' much in the same way as the biblical Flood account is often described as a 'negative creation account'" (Wright 2015, 149-150).