Template:Rubrics/Phrasal

|Guardian Review|Overseer Review|Final Checks|Description| | --- | --- | --- | --- | |||| **Completeness** |[ ]||| The page includes every element required by the creator guidelines. |[ ]||| Complete diagram |[ ]||| Construct phrases marked and glossed. |[ ]||| Prepositional phrases and nominal adverbs marked and glossed. |[ ]||| *Waw* phrases, hendiadys and serial verbs marked and glossed. |[ ]||| Appositional phrases marked and glossed. |[ ]||| Definite articles marked. |[ ]||| Quantifiers marked. |||| **Quality of Analysis** |[ ]|[ ]|[ ]| In the case of difficulties and alternatives, each view is thoroughly explained and defended with a note. |[ ]|[ ]|[ ]| Preferred views are well grounded in evidence. |||| **Engagement with secondary literature** |[ ]|[ ]|| Effort was made to consult grammars, commentaries, articles and other reference sources (e.g., Jenni) for difficult phrases. |[ ]|[ ]|[ ]| Notes are well-researched and citations are properly documented. |||| **Clarity of language** |[ ]|[ ]|[ ]| Prose (within notes) is clear and concise. |[ ]|[ ]|[ ]| Language is not too technical so as to be inaccessible to [Sarah](https://psalms.scriptura.org/w/Personas). If a technical concept is unavoidable, it is clearly explained. |||| **Formatting/Style** |[ ]|[ ]|| Phrasal glosses and symbols are properly encoded in the diagrammer. |[ ]|[ ]|| All sources are properly cited (see Style guide). |[ ]|[ ]|| Notes are free of typos. |[ ]|[ ]|[ ]| Double arrows (>>) are used to separate literal from figurative phrasal glosses as well as language that needs to changed in any way.|