Template:Rubrics/Participant

|Guardian Review|Overseer Review|Final Checks|Description| | --- | --- | --- | --- | |||| **Completeness** |[ ]||| The page includes every element required by the creator guidelines. |||| *Analysis Tasks* |[ ]||| Completed Text Table (§2.1-2) |[ ]||| Completed Participant Sets List (§2.3) |[ ]||| Completed Notes Section (§2.4) |||| *Synthesis Tasks* |[ ]||| Completed Participant Profile Notes (§3.1) |[ ]||| Completed Summary Visual (Relations Diagram) (§3.2) |[ ]||| Completed Summary Distribution Visual (§3.3) |[ ]||| Completed Mini-story (§3.4) |||| **Quality of Analysis**| |[ ]|[ ]|[ ]| In the case of difficulties and alternatives, each view is thoroughly explained and defended with a note. |[ ]|[ ]|[ ]| Preferred views are well grounded in evidence. |||| **Engagement with secondary literature** |[ ]|[ ]|| Effort was made to consult commentaries, articles and other reference sources ambiguities in participant reference. |[ ]|[ ]|| Notes are well-researched and citations are properly documented. |||| **Clarity of language** |[ ]|[ ]|[ ]| Prose (within notes) is clear and concise. |[ ]|[ ]|[ ]| Language is not too technical so as to be inaccessible to [Sarah](https://psalms.scriptura.org/w/Personas). If a technical concept is unavoidable, it must be clearly explained. |||| **Formatting/Style** |[ ]|[ ]|| All tables and visuals are formatted exactly according to the creator guidelines. |[ ]||| All sources are properly cited (Author Date, Page). |[ ]||| Notes are free of typos.