Template:Rubrics/Exegetical Issues

|Guardian Review|Overseer Review|Final Checks|Description| | --- | --- | --- | --- | |||| **Completeness** |[ ]||| The page includes every element required by the creator guidelines. |||| *Introduction* |[ ]||| Hebrew text |[ ]||| Modern translations to illustrate |[ ]||| Breakdown of the issue; list of views |||| *Argument maps* |[ ]||| One argument map for each view |[ ]||| Brief prose introduction to each argument map |[ ]||| Indication of preferred view |||| *Conclusion* |[ ]||| Statement of preferred view |[ ]||| Summary of argument(s) for and against preferred view |[ ]||| Summary of significance |[ ]||| Confidence rating (A-D) |||| *Research* |[ ]||| Ancient translations |[ ]||| Modern translations |[ ]||| Secondary literature bibliography |||| **Quality of argumentation** |[ ]|[ ]|[ ]| Each colored box in the argument map clearly expresses a complete proposition or a series of complete propositions which, together, form an argument. |[ ]|[ ]|[ ]| The relationships among propositions are accurately expressed; green, red, and purple arrows are properly used. |[ ]|[ ]|[ ]| Arguments for preferred conclusions are cogent. |[ ]|[ ]|[ ]| The arguments supporting the conclusion are well supported by evidence. |[ ]|[ ]|[ ]| The arguments supporting the conclusion actually support the conclusion. |||| **Depth of content** |[ ]|[ ]|[ ]| Evidence is provided for each view in the argument maps (insofar as evidence exists for a particular view). |[ ]|[ ]|[ ]| No relevant evidence has been omitted from the discussion. |||| **Engagement with secondary literature** |[ ]|[ ]|| Secondary sources are cited throughout the page, especially in the argument maps. |[ ]|[ ]|[ ]| The arguments of other scholars with whom we disagree are put forward in the strongest possible terms. |[ ]|[ ]|| No secondary source which is especially relevant to the discussion has been omitted. |||| **Clarity of language** |[ ]|[ ]|[ ]| Prose (introduction, conclusion, introductions to views) is clear and concise. |[ ]|[ ]|[ ]| Text within the argument maps is clear and concise. |[ ]|[ ]|[ ]| Titles to nodes in the argument maps are clear and concise and accurately summarise the content of the node. |[ ]|[ ]|[ ]| Language is not too technical so as to be inaccessible to [Sarah](https://psalms.scriptura.org/w/Personas). |||| **Formatting/Style** |[ ]||| Correct spelling and punctuation is used throughout. |[ ]||| Page is properly titled. |[ ]||| Page is properly structured. |[ ]||| Page is assigned to the “Argument maps” category. |[ ]||| Page is assigned the correct chapter and verse number. |[ ]||| Argument map colors are used properly. |[ ]||| Argument map symbols are used properly and thoroughly. |[ ]||| Every node in each argument map has a title. |[ ]||| Sources are cited properly and thoroughly. |[ ]||| Tags are removed from the argument map. |[ ]||| The argument map is arranged (up-down vs left-right) in the manner that makes it easiest to read. |